Working Paper Abstract

Matters of Life and Death: The Durability of Discretionary Programs 1970–2004
Christopher R. Berry, Berry C. Burden, and William G. Howell
http://www.harrisschool.uchicago.edu/faculty/web-pages/christopher-berry.asp

Abstract:
Contrary to the prevailing view that federal programs are immortal, we show that program death is commonplace and seek to explain why. We develop a simple model of distributive politics, which we call "probabilistic universalism." Our theory suggests that differences in the ideological composition of coalitions between a current and an enacting Congress drive program elimination. To test the theory, we examine the durability of every federal discretionary program established between 1970 and 2004, using a new dataset that distinguishes program death from restructuring. Consistent with our predictions, we find that changes in the partisan composition of coalitions have a strong influence on program durability. We also demonstrate that these effects are asymmetric: programmatic life spans are shortened by coalition losses and lengthened by coalition gains. We thus debunk the conventional wisdom that federal programs are everlasting while providing a plausible coalition-based account for their varying life spans.

The complete document may be downloaded or viewed using Adobe Acrobat Reader. If you do not have Adobe Acrobat Reader, you can download it from Adobe.